Clarus Financial Technology

Fed Rate Hikes Are Reducing The Average Life Of USD Swaps

Hypothesis

We start with a simple hypothesis today. In a ZIRP-world, market participants are forced to extend their swap maturities for two reasons:

This effect has been crystallised ever since the financial crisis with curves “bull-flattening” across Fixed Income.

Cue Fed Rate hikes. Has this change in monetary policy changed either of these behaviours over the previous fifteen months? Of course, it will be impossible to dislocate the effects of a (potential) shift in fiscal policy affecting long-term interest rates in the US as well. However, with that caveat in place, let’s take a look at the data.

The Data

I had no idea when I set out to test this hypothesis how easy (or hard!) it would be to get the SDR-related data. I essentially needed to run a query on all USD Interest Rate Swaps that;

You may or may not be surprised to read that SDRView Res does this in a single call – either from our API or GUI:

USD Swap Notionals traded during 2016 by month of trade execution and underlying swap tenor.

Showing;

USD Libor Swap Data

I’ve summarised each month’s data into a single data point – the weighted average maturity (in months) of all USD Fixed-Float swaps. I excluded all back-starting swaps from the analysis as the tenor designation is a little bit of a misnomer for these products.

Armed with a clean data-set, we see the following trend in average tenor traded:

Average Tenor of USD Swaps traded each month between 2014 and 2017

Showing;

USD OIS Data

One of the themes of our recent Swap Reviews has been the ever-increasing volumes we see in OIS swaps – particularly in USD. Are these impacting the average maturity in the market? It’s a valid supposition, so let’s add USD OIS swaps into our data mix and see.

First, USD OIS as a standalone product:

Average Tenor of USD OIS Swaps traded each month since 2014

Showing;

What therefore happens when we combine the two data-sets?

Average Tenor of all USD Swaps traded each month since 2014

On that last point, it is worth noting that the total amount of risk traded in OIS products has increased significantly. OIS trades are getting shorter, but notional volumes are increasing at a much faster rate. This is shown in the chart below:

Total DV01 traded in OIS swaps

Showing;

Product Mix of Risk traded OIS vs IRS

Risk Analysis

One aspect of this analysis that concerned me was that of verifying the total amount of risk traded versus the average maturity. Remember that a simple count of the number of months in a trade is a linear calculation, whilst DV01 (i.e. the risk) is not. At each step, I have therefore verified that the total notional, multiplied by the DV01 of the calculated average maturity is always roughly equal to the total DV01 traded. This applies to both OIS and Libor swaps.

The natural next step for this analysis is to measure the average maturity on a DV01-weighted basis. We looked at this average duration back in January 2017 for SEF markets here. We have some more investigation to do when combining the figures across IRS, OIS and even FRA markets. Watch this space.

Final Thoughts

There is, of course, a fairly likely base to find here. How short can the average maturity go? It is very unlikely that all accounts will start trading 1 month Fed dates instead of ten-year swaps.

What I find more interesting is that we have never had this level of transparency during a monetary policy change before.

It therefore seems crazy not to use this hard-won transparency to monitor as many behaviours as possible across our markets.

Stay informed with our FREE newsletter, subscribe here.

Exit mobile version